July 15, 2024

It’s been a while since I posted a blog so I have several shoots to catch up on from the past few weeks.

Here’s a small selection of images from Roxy Mendez’s shoot, these are taken from the photosets as well as from the VR videos plus the last few sets were also shot as regular 4k videos.

4 thoughts on “Roxy Mendez

  1. And updates with new content become rarer and rarer. E.g. for StrictlyGlamour from 7 updates a week some months ago down to only 3 in the last weeks. Instead old stuff from the times before November 2021 are “recycled”.

    Is there any reason why?

    1. Hi, it’s economics. The sites barely break even and some are running at a loss. Costs have risen a lot over the past 2-3 years, there’s more and more ‘piracy’ (‘Pirates’ being an all too romantic name for thieving scum), plus the massive rise of OnlyFans is taking a very large proportion of the money available in this industry. On top of that I’ve had some health issues recently and I just can’t go on slogging my guts out 7 days a week and getting next to nothing for it.
      At the end of the day you’re still getting a lot of content for $25 a month – $25 wouldn’t buy you two videos on most clips site, yet I had someone complaining that they “weren’t happy” recently after joining one of the sites. They had used a (old) special offer deal and joined for $15, giving them access to around 500 sets, yet they weren’t “happy” and told me they would be cancelling their subscription. I don’t know what they want for $15? Incidentally, out of that $15 I received $5.76 after the affiliate (who sent the sale) and the bill processing company and middle men had taken their cut. You can imagine that $5.76 doesn’t go very far towards paying the model fees, server costs, web costs and DMCA service fees (to get pirated (stolen) material taken down), etc.
      I don’t know if that’s the answer you were looking for but those are the primary reasons that I’m having to cut down on the sites’ output.
      Best wishes,
      Mike.

  2. Let me start by saying that I’m a HUGE fan of Glosstightsglamour (the other sites, eh, not so much). While there other tights/pantyhose sites on the internet, you have a brought a mostly classy vibe to the genre. (Although, like the shoots at OAS, I’m disappointed when models who pose nude, or at least used to, wear panties under their tights.)

    Now for the bad news. I agree with P. Mazzetti; less frequent updates and taking down early/old content just so you can recycle it at a later time is not cool and only pisses off long time members. To borrow a phrase from TV, it signals that you’ve “jumped the shark.”

    I’ve also noticed a slower rate of models coming by to shoot. You need to have at least 2-3 models a week; one just isn’t cutting it.

    Either find a way to either generate or obtain new content to post on a consistent schedule or just archive the site.

    Sincerely,
    Hoping for the best

    1. Thanks for your kind comments about the site, but as I said previously, it’s no longer economically viable to book so many models and post so many updates a week.
      Best wishes,
      Mike.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *